Goto

Collaborating Authors

 prediction task


Appendix ABroader Impacts

Neural Information Processing Systems

The proposed research on pre-training temporal graph neural networks across multiple networks has the potential to advance the field of machine learning and its applications significantly. By introducing methodologies to enhance the scalability and transferability of TGNNs, this work could revolutionize areas like network security, financial fraud detection, and real-time social network analysis, where dynamic and adaptive models are essential. The publicly available dataset of 84 Ethereum-based temporal networks will serve as a valuable resource for the research community, fostering innovation and collaboration. Furthermore, the principles of multi-network pre-training introduced here can inspire analogous advances in other temporal data domains, such as healthcare, transportation, and climate science. This research opens up a new direction in training generalizable temporal graph models that, for the first time, can be trained on distinct temporal networks, paving the way for Temporal Graph Foundation Models. This work also introduces a set of Ethereum transaction token networks, which are publicly available to users who have the necessary resources, such as fast SSDs, large RAM, and ample disk space, to synchronize Ethereum clients and manually extract blocks. Additionally, all Ethereum data is accessible on numerous Ethereum explorer sites such as etherscan.io. An Ethereum user's privacy depends on whether personally identifiable information (PII) is associated with any of their blockchain address, which serves as account handles and are considered pseudonymous. If such PII were obtained from other sources, our datasets could potentially be used to link Ethereum addresses. However, real-life identities can only be discovered using IP tracking information, which we neither have nor share. Our data does not contain any PII. Furthermore, we have developed a request to exclude an address from the dataset. Benchmark datasets have become fundamental for advancing graph machine learning, providing a common ground to evaluate models and facilitate the development of graph foundation models. Early graph ML studies often relied on a handful of small, static benchmark graphs (e.g., citation networks like Cora/Citeseer and molecular graphs from the TU collection [37]).


MiNT: Multi-Network Transfer Benchmark for Temporal Graph Learning

Neural Information Processing Systems

Temporal Graph Learning (TGL) aims to discover patterns in evolving networks or temporal graphs and leverage these patterns to predict future interactions. However, most existing research focuses on learning from a single network in isolation, leaving the challenges of within-domain and cross-domain generalization largely unaddressed. In this study, we introduce a new benchmark of 84 real-world temporal transaction networks and propose Temporal Multi-network Transfer (MiNT), a pre-training framework designed to capture transferable temporal dynamics across diverse networks. We train MiNT models on up to 64 transaction networks and evaluate their generalization ability on 20 held-out, unseen networks. Our results show that MiNT consistently outperforms individually trained models, revealing a strong relation between the number of pre-training networks and transfer performance. These findings highlight scaling trends in temporal graph learning and underscore the importance of network diversity in improving generalization. This work establishes the first large-scale benchmark for studying transferability in TGL and lays the groundwork for developing Temporal Graph Foundation Models.


CODECRASH: Exposing LLMFragility to Misleading Natural Language in Code Reasoning

Neural Information Processing Systems

Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated strong capabilities in code-related tasks, but their robustness in code reasoning under perturbations remains underexplored. We introduce CODECRASH, a stress-testing framework with 1,279 questions from CRUXEVAL and LIVECODEBENCH, designed to evaluate reasoning reliability under structural perturbations and misleading natural language (NL) contexts. Through a systematic evaluation of 17 LLMs, we find that models often shortcut reasoning by over-relying on NL cues, leading to an average performance degradation of 23.2% in output prediction tasks. Even with Chain-of-Thought reasoning, models on average still have a 13.8%drop due to distractibility and rationalization, revealing a lack of critical reasoning capability to distinguish the actual code behaviors. While Large Reasoning Models with internal reasoning mechanisms improve robustness by fostering critical thinking, plausible yet incorrect hints can trigger pathological self-reflection, causing 2 3 times token consumption and even catastrophic cognitive dissonance in extreme cases for QwQ-32B. We refer to this phenomenon as Reasoning Collapse. CODECRASH provides a rigorous benchmark for evaluating robustness in code reasoning, guiding future research and development toward more reliable and resilient models.


Mixing Expert Knowledge: Bring Human Thoughts Back To the Game of Go

Neural Information Processing Systems

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional performance in reasoning tasks such as mathematics and coding, matching or surpassing human capabilities. However, these impressive reasoning abilities face significant challenges in specialized domains. Taking Go as an example, although AlphaGo has established the high performance ceiling of AI systems in Go, mainstream LLMs still struggle to reach even beginner-level proficiency, let alone perform natural language reasoning. This performance gap between general-purpose LLMs and domain experts is significantly limiting the application of LLMs on a wider range of domain-specific tasks. In this work, we aim to bridge the divide between LLMs' general reasoning capabilities and expert knowledge in domain-specific tasks. We perform mixed fine-tuning with structured Go expertise and general long Chain-ofThought (CoT) reasoning data as a cold start, followed by reinforcement learning to integrate expert knowledge in Go with general reasoning capabilities. Through this methodology, we present LoGos, a powerful LLM that not only maintains outstanding general reasoning abilities, but also conducts Go gameplay in natural language, demonstrating effective strategic reasoning and accurate next-move prediction. LoGos achieves performance comparable to human professional players, substantially surpassing all existing LLMs. Through this work, we aim to contribute insights on applying general LLM reasoning capabilities to specialized domains.


DecompNet: Enhancing Time Series Forecasting Models with Implicit Decomposition

Neural Information Processing Systems

And based on this idea, we propose a powerful decomposition-based enhancement framework, namely DecompNet. Our method converts the time series decomposition into an implicit process, where it can give a time series model the decomposition-related knowledge during inference, even though this model does not actually decompose the input time series. Thus, our DecompNet can enable a model to inherit the performance promotion brought by time series decomposition but will not introduce any additional inference costs, successfully enhancing the model performance while enjoying better efficiency. Experimentally, our DecompNet exhibits promising enhancement capability and compelling framework generality. Especially, it can also enhance the performance of the latest and state-of-the-art models, greatly pushing the performance limit of time series forecasting. Through comprehensive comparisons, DecompNet also shows excellent performance and efficiency superiority, making the decomposition-based enhancement framework surpass the well-recognized normalization-based frameworks for the first time.



Variational Uncertainty Decomposition for In-Context Learning

Neural Information Processing Systems

As large language models (LLMs) gain popularity in conducting prediction tasks in-context, understanding the sources of uncertainty in in-context learning becomes essential to ensuring reliability. The recent hypothesis of in-context learning performing predictive Bayesian inference opens the avenue for Bayesian uncertainty estimation, particularly for decomposing uncertainty into epistemic uncertainty due to lack of in-context data and aleatoric uncertainty inherent in the in-context prediction task. However, the decomposition idea remains under-explored due to the intractability of the latent parameter posterior from the underlying Bayesian model. In this work, we introduce a variational uncertainty decomposition framework for in-context learning without explicitly sampling from the latent parameter posterior, by optimising auxiliary inputs as probes to obtain an upper bound to the aleatoric uncertainty of an LLM's in-context learning procedure. Through experiments on synthetic and real-world tasks, we show quantitatively and qualitatively that the decomposed uncertainties obtained from our method exhibit desirable properties of epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty.


When Can Digital Personas Reliably Approximate Human Survey Findings?

arXiv.org Machine Learning

Digital personas powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly proposed as substitutes for human survey respondents, yet it remains unclear when they can reliably approximate human survey findings. We answer this question using the LISS panel, constructing personas from respondents' background variables and pre-2023 survey histories, then testing them against the same respondents' held-out post-cutoff answers. Across four persona architectures, three LLMs, and two prediction tasks, we assess performance at the question, respondent, distributional, equity, and clustering levels. Digital personas improve alignment with human response distributions, especially in domains tied to stable attributes and values, but remain limited for individual prediction and fail to recover multivariate respondent structure. Retrieval-augmented architectures provide the clearest gains, but performance depends more on human response structure than on model choice: personas perform best for low-variability questions and common respondent patterns, and worst for subjective, heterogeneous, or rare responses. Our results provide practical guidance on when digital personas could be appropriate for survey research and when human validation remains necessary.